Jump to content

Theophilos (emperor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Theophilus the Iconoclast)

Theophilos
Emperor of the Romans
Theophilus, in the Chronicle of John Skylitzes
Byzantine emperor
Reign2 October 829 – 20 January 842
Coronation12 May 821
PredecessorMichael II
SuccessorMichael III and Theodora
Co-emperorConstantine (830s)
Born812
Died(842-01-20)20 January 842
ConsortTheodora
IssueConstantine
Thekla
Anna
Anastasia
Pulcheria
Maria
Michael III
DynastyAmorian dynasty
FatherMichael II
MotherThekla

Theophilos (Greek: Θεόφιλος, romanizedTheóphilos, sometimes Latinised as Theophilus; c. 812 – 20 January 842) was the Byzantine Emperor from 829 until his death in 842. He was the second emperor of the Amorian dynasty and the last emperor to support iconoclasm. Theophilos personally led the armies in his long war against both the Abbasid Caliphate and the Aghlabids in Sicily, beginning in 831.

Biography

[edit]

Early life

[edit]
Theophilos on a coin of his father, Michael II, founder of the Amorian dynasty.

Theophilos was the son of Emperor Michael II and his wife Thekla, and the godson of Emperor Leo V the Armenian. Michael II crowned Theophilos co-emperor in 821. The date is almost universally given as 12 May 821 (Whitsunday),[1][2][3] although this is not really corroborated by any source (another possible date is 24 March, Easter).[4] Unlike his father, Theophilos received an extensive education from John Hylilas, the grammarian, and was a great admirer of music and art.[5]

Accession to the throne

[edit]

On 2 October 829, Theophilos succeeded his father as sole emperor.[6] Theophilos continued in his predecessors' iconoclasm, though without his father's more conciliatory tone,[5] issuing an edict in 832 forbidding the veneration of icons.[7] He also saw himself as the champion of justice, which he served most ostentatiously by executing his father's co-conspirators against Leo V immediately after his accession.[8]

Theophilos ordering the urban prefect to execute his father's co-conspirators, who were involved in the murder of Leo V

Campaigns against the Arabs

[edit]
Abbasid Caliph al-Mamun sends an envoy to Emperor Theophilos.

At the time of his accession, Theophilos was obliged to wage wars against the Arabs on two fronts. Sicily was once again invaded by the Arabs, who took Palermo after a year-long siege in 831, established the Emirate of Sicily, and gradually continued to expand across the island. The defence after the invasion of Anatolia by al-Ma'mun the Abbasid Caliph in 830 was led by the Emperor himself, but the Byzantines were defeated and lost several fortresses. In 831 Theophilos retaliated by leading a large army into Cilicia and capturing Tarsus. The Emperor returned to Constantinople in triumph, but in the autumn he was defeated in Cappadocia. Another defeat in the same province in 833 forced Theophilos to sue for peace (Theophilos offered 100,000 gold dinars and the return of 7,000 prisoners), which he obtained the next year, after the death of al-Ma'mun.[9]

Theophilos celebrating a triumph through Constantinople.

During the respite from the war against the Abbasids, Theophilos arranged for the abduction of the Byzantine captives settled north of the Danube by Krum of Bulgaria. The rescue operation was carried out with success in c. 836, and the peace between Bulgaria and the Byzantine Empire was quickly restored. However, it proved impossible to maintain peace in the East. Theophilos had given asylum to a number of refugees from the east in 834, including Nasr, a Persian.[10] He baptized one of the refugees, Theophobos, who married the Emperor's aunt Irene and became one of his generals.[7] As relations with the Abbasids deteriorated, Theophilos prepared for a new war.

Follis of a new type, minted in large quantities in celebration of Theophilos' victories against the Arabs from c. 835 on. On the obverse he is represented in triumphal attire, wearing the toupha, and on the reverse the traditional acclamation "Theophilos Augustus, you conquer".

In 837, Theophilos led a vast army of 70,000 men towards Mesopotamia and captured Melitene and Arsamosata.[11] The Emperor also took and destroyed Sozopetra, which some sources claim as the birthplace of Caliph al-Mu'tasim.[a] Theophilos returned to Constantinople in triumph. Eager for revenge, al-Mu'tasim assembled a vast army and launched a two-pronged invasion of Anatolia in 838. Theophilos decided to strike one division of the caliph's army before they could combine. On 21 July 838 at the Battle of Anzen in Dazimon, Theophilos personally led a Byzantine army of 25,000 to 40,000 men against the troops commanded by al-Afshin.[16][17] Afshin withstood the Byzantine attack, counter-attacked, and won the battle. The Byzantine survivors fell back in disorder and did not interfere in the caliph's continuing campaign.

The Byzantines engaging the Arabs in Asia Minor.

Al-Mu'tasim took Ancyra, and al-Afshin joined him there. The full Abbasid army advanced against Amorium, the cradle of the dynasty. Initially there was determined resistance. Then a Muslim captive escaped and informed the caliph where there was a section of the wall that had only a front facade. Al-Mu'tasim concentrated his bombardment on this section, and the wall was breached. Having heroically held for fifty-five days, the city fell to al-Mu'tasim on 12 or 15 August 838.[7]

The Fall of Amorium to the Arabs in 838.

Around 841, the Republic of Venice sent a fleet of 60 galleys (each carrying 200 men) to assist the Byzantines in driving the Arabs from Crotone, but it failed.[18] During this campaign al-Mu'tasim discovered that some of his top generals were plotting against him. Many of these leading commanders were arrested and some executed before he arrived home. Al-Afshin seems not to have been involved in this, but he was detected in other intrigues and died in prison in the spring of 841. Caliph al-Mu'tasim fell sick in October 841 and died on 5 January 842.

Stabilisation

[edit]

Despite major defeats at the hands of the Abbasids, the Byzantines consolidated and gained a degree of economic stability, and was no longer facing an existential threat. Theophilos was a keen builder and administrator, and in 837 constructed an "Abbasid"-style palace in Bryas near Chalcedon. Through the construction of lavish palaces and exchange of precious goods and manuscripts, he intended to rival the court at Baghdad, which was itself seeing a revival of Hellenic thought. Even as far as the streets of Guangzhou during the era of the Tang dynasty, the Arab-style kaftan was in fashion. In the tenth century, Liudprand of Cremona reported that Theophilos decorated the reception hall of the Magnaura with a throne and automata of lions and birds. Theophilos also repaired the Walls of Constantinople near the Blachernae district as well as large sections of the sea walls.[19][20][21]

In 838, in order to impress the Caliph of Baghdad, Theophilus had John the Grammarian distribute 36,000 nomismata to the citizens of Baghdad. In 839 or 840, he initiated diplomatic contact with the Umayyad Emirate of Córdoba. The name of his ambassador is somewhat garbled in the Arabic accounts of Ibn Hayyan, but it seems to have been the admiral Krateros. He was accompanied on his return by the Córdoban poet al-Ghazal, who signed a pact of friendship with Theophilos directed against the Abbasids.[22][23][24]

The persistent warfare had caused a serious manpower shortage, which Theophilos attempted to remedy by resettling defectors from the Caliphate into Asia Minor, and issuing an edict requiring Roman widows to marry barbarian immigrants, which was reported in the Life of Athanasia of Aegina.[25]

Intensification of iconoclastic policies

[edit]
Theophilos argues with the iconophile monk Lazarus.

The capture of Palermo by the Arabs, Theophilos' defeat in Cappadocia in 831 and the discovery of a treasonous plot by iconodules in Constantinople likely pressured the Emperor into enacting an iconoclastic policy that was more severe than that of his father, which Theophilos had maintained from the beginning of his reign. He was supported by John the Grammarian, patriarchal synkellos (secretary) of Patriarch Antony I of Constantinople. Theophanes Continuatus reports that Theophilos forbade the painting of religious images and removed existing images, replacing them with secular images (e.g., of birds and animals), on similar grounds expressed in the Acts of the Council of Constantinople of 815. In 833, he persecuted iconodules who were not in communion with the Patriarch by ordering the seizing of the property of those who helped or sheltered them.[26]

Along with his severe iconoclastic policy, Theophilos persecuted numerous individuals for political and religious reasons, in a targeted and methodical way, however it does appear that he was more politically than religiously motivated overall. Euthymius of Sardis and Joseph the Confessor were arrested and beaten for distributing or writing pamphlets foretelling the death of the Emperor. Euthymius was elderly and died from his injuries, Joseph was imprisoned and their associate Theophilos of Ephesos was forced into hiding. The pamphlets were considered defamatory and thus treasonous. Nicetas the Patrician, distant relative of Empress Irene and former stratēgos of Sicily, was banished for refusing to take communion with the Patriarch in 830. The Palestinian monks Theodorus and Theophanes were said to be so defiant that verses describing their crimes were branded on their foreheads. Iconodule monks were forbidden access Much of the persecution of iconodules was in effect punishment for challenging imperial authority rather than iconodulia as such. The abbot Methodios was publicly and provocatively opposed to the imperial policy, and was imprisoned and beaten for his disobedience. However perhaps through his connections to the imperial household or his alleged prophetic powers that may have awed Theophilos, Methodios became an associate of the Emperor. Tenth-century sources report that Theophilos' own wife, Theodora and her mother maintained iconodulia, however there is no contemporary evidence of this.[27][28]

The majority of the clergy did not revolt against imperial policy, including Joannicius the Great, who was criticised for his compliance by Theodore the Stoudite, and Ignatios, later Patriarch of Constantinople. Neither did Theophilos oppose all monasteries, although he used some to confine iconodule clerics, as did Emperor Leo V the Armenian.[29]

Due to the unanimous iconodule sympathies of contemporary sources, it is difficult to determine the existence and extent of a popular iconoclast or iconodule tradition. It is likely that the changes in imperial policy in 787 and 815 only affected a small number of individuals and did not alter the religious practices of the whole population to a great degree. Theophilos' iconoclasm may have served as an opportunistic means of asserting imperial authority, rather than a purely theological doctrine, but there is no reason to doubt that he was sincere in his iconoclastic convictions.[30]

Relations with Bulgaria and Serbia

[edit]

In 836, following the expiration of the 20-year peace treaty between the Empire and Bulgaria, Theophilos ravaged the Bulgarian frontier. The Bulgarians retaliated, and under the leadership of Isbul they reached Adrianople. At this time, if not earlier, the Bulgarians annexed Philippopolis and its environs. Khan Malamir died in 836.

The peace between the Serbs, Byzantine foederati, and the Bulgars lasted until 839. Vlastimir of Serbia united several tribes, and Theophilos granted the Serbs independence; Vlastimir acknowledged nominal overlordship of the Emperor. The annexation of western Macedonia by the Bulgars changed the political situation. Malamir or his successor may have seen a threat in the Serb consolidation and opted to subjugate them in the midst of the conquest of Slav lands. Another cause might have been that the Byzantines wanted to divert attention so that they could cope with the Slavic uprising in the Peloponnese, meaning they sent the Serbs to instigate the war. It is thought that the rapid extension of Bulgars over Slavs prompted the Serbs to unite into a state.[31][32][33]

Khan Presian I (r. 836–852)[34] invaded Serbian territory in 839 (see Bulgarian–Serbian Wars). The invasion led to a three-year war, in which Vlastimir was victorious;[35] Presian was heavily defeated, made no territorial gains, and lost many of his men. The Serbs had a tactical advantage in the hills,[36] and the Bulgars were driven out by the army of Vlastimir. The war ended with the death of Theophilos, which released Vlastimir from his obligations to the Byzantine Empire.

Death

[edit]
Theophilos receiving the head of the slain rebel Theophobos at his deathbed.

The health of Theophilos gradually failed, and he died on 20 January 842.[37]

Assessment and legacy

[edit]

Theophilos was the last iconoclast emperor of the Byzantine Empire, and his strict insistence on the removal of images and banning of the production of icons as reported by later sources represents a return to the spirit of Constantine V's Council of Hieria of 754. Theophilos was a more committed iconoclast than his father, Michael II, and so their relationship resembles that between Leo III the Isaurian and Constantine V, the renowned iconoclast emperors of the eighth century. In both cases, the father was a soldier of humble origins and the son brought up in the intellectually sophisticated environment of the imperial household. Theophilos' wife Theodora (r. 842–856) defended him, which mitigated the damnatio memoriae against him and his father Michael, nevertheless the later iconodule sources were highly critical of them.[5][38][39]

Theophilos was successful in establishing his reputation as a just ruler, and even hostile anti-Amorian chronicles retain accounts of his justice. Like Emperor Leo V the Armenian, he was viewed as close to the people and eager to defend them against injustices committed by their officials. However, Theophilos' dealings with the Empire's enemies drew criticism, particularly due to the loss of the fortress of Loulon and the city of Tyana in raids led by Caliph al-Ma'mun from 830 to 832, and the Sack of Amorium by Caliph al-Mu'tasim in 838. Nevertheless, his reputation as a just ruler endured, as can be seen in the composition Timarion, in which Theophilos is featured as one of the judges in the Netherworld.[40][41][8]

Theophilos strengthened the Walls of Constantinople, built the fortress of Sarkel on the Don river in Khazar territories, created the Cherson and Chaldian themes, and built a hospital, which continued to exist until the twilight of the Byzantine Empire.[5][8][7]

Family

[edit]
Solidus depicting Theophilos, with his father Michael II and his eldest son Constantine in the reverse. Like the Isaurians, Theophilos used coinage to insist upon dynastic rule and continuity.[42]
Theodora, the empress consort of Theophilos.

By his marriage with Theodora, Theophilos had seven children: two sons and five daughters:

  • Constantine (c. 830c. 836). Co-emperor from c. 833 to c. 836. He drowned in a domestic incident.
  • Thekla (c. 831 – after 867). She was named Augusta and her image appears in coinage during the regency of her mother. Later exiled to a monastery by her brother, Michael.
  • Anna (b. c. 832). Exiled to the monastery of Gastria, where she died.
  • Anastasia (b. c. 833). Exiled to the monastery of Gastria, where she died.
  • Pulcheria (born c. 836). Exiled to the monastery of Gastria, where she died.
  • Maria (b. c. 838). She was betrothed to the Caesar Alexios Mosele. Exiled to the monastery of Gastria before her sisters and died before their exile.
  • Michael III (840 – 867), who succeeded as emperor.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The claim that Sozopetra or Arsamosata was Mu'tasim's native city is found only in Byzantine sources. This claim is dismissed by most scholars as a later invention, i.e. as a parallel to Amorium, the likely birthplace of Theophilos. It was probably added deliberately to balance and lessen the effect of the blow that the latter's fall represented.[12][13][14][15]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ Grierson 1973, p. 387.
  2. ^ Bury 1912, p. 80.
  3. ^ Codoñer 2016, p. 73.
  4. ^ Treadgold 1979.
  5. ^ a b c d Gregory 2010, p. 227.
  6. ^ Kazhdan 1991, p. 1363.
  7. ^ a b c d Chisholm 1911, p. 786.
  8. ^ a b c Kazhdan 1991, p. 2066.
  9. ^ Norwich 1991, p. 47.
  10. ^ Ševčenko 1968, p. 111.
  11. ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 440.
  12. ^ Bury 1912, p. 262.
  13. ^ Treadgold 1988, p. 440.
  14. ^ Vasiliev 1935, p. 141.
  15. ^ Kiapidou 2003.
  16. ^ Haldon 2008, p. 83.
  17. ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 441.
  18. ^ Norwich 1982, p. 32.
  19. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, p. 405.
  20. ^ Mackintosh-Smith 2019.
  21. ^ Auzépy 2008, pp. 265, 273.
  22. ^ Norwich 1991, p. 43.
  23. ^ Codoñer 2016, pp. 316–320.
  24. ^ Auzépy 2008, pp. 273–274.
  25. ^ Auzépy 2008, p. 261.
  26. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, pp. 392–394.
  27. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, pp. 393–399.
  28. ^ Auzépy 2008, pp. 289–290.
  29. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, p. 396.
  30. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, pp. 400–403.
  31. ^ Bury 1912, p. 372.
  32. ^ Kovačević & Jovanović 1893, pp. 38–39.
  33. ^ Stanojević 1908, pp. 46–47.
  34. ^ Fine 1991, p. 108.
  35. ^ Fine 1991, p. 110.
  36. ^ Runciman 1930, p. 88.
  37. ^ Bekker 1838, p. 139.
  38. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, pp. 392, 400–401.
  39. ^ Auzépy 2008, p. 254.
  40. ^ Brubaker & Haldon 2011, p. 392.
  41. ^ Auzépy 2008, pp. 256, 275.
  42. ^ Auzépy 2008, p. 274.

References

[edit]

Primary sources

[edit]
  • Bekker, Immanuel, ed. (1838). "Libri III: 41". Theophanes Continuatus. p. 139. Paucos hinc dies vitae superstes vigesima die Ianuarii naturae debitum solvit, imperio potitus annos duodecim menses tres.

Secondary sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Theophilos (emperor)
Born: 813 Died: 20 January 842
Regnal titles
Preceded by Byzantine emperor
2 October 829 – 20 January 842
Succeeded by
Political offices
Preceded by
Michael II in 821,
then lapsed
Roman consul
830
Succeeded by
Lapsed,
Michael III in 843