Qin dynasty
Qin | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
221–206 BC | |||||||||||||||
Capital | Xianyang | ||||||||||||||
Common languages | Old Chinese | ||||||||||||||
Government | Absolute monarchy | ||||||||||||||
Emperor | |||||||||||||||
• 221–210 BC | Qin Shi Huang | ||||||||||||||
• 210–207 BC | Qin Er Shi | ||||||||||||||
Chancellor | |||||||||||||||
• 221–208 BC | Li Si | ||||||||||||||
• 208–207 BC | Zhao Gao | ||||||||||||||
Historical era | Imperial | ||||||||||||||
• Accession of Qin Shi Huang | 221 BC | ||||||||||||||
• Death of Qin Shi Huang | 210 BC | ||||||||||||||
• Surrender to Liu Bang | 206 BC | ||||||||||||||
Area | |||||||||||||||
220 BC[1] | 2,300,000 km2 (890,000 sq mi) | ||||||||||||||
Currency | Ban Liang | ||||||||||||||
|
Qin dynasty | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese | 秦 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hanyu Pinyin | Qín | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part of a series on the |
History of China |
---|
The Qin dynasty (/tʃɪn/;[3] CHIN) was the first dynasty of Imperial China. It is named for its progenitor state of Qin, which was a fief of the confederal Zhou dynasty that had endured for over five centuries. Beginning in 230 BC, the Qin under King Ying Zheng engaged in a series of wars conquering each of the rival states that had previously pledged fealty to the Zhou. This culminated in 221 BC with the successful unification of China under Qin, which then assumed an imperial prerogative—with Ying Zheng declaring himself to be Qin Shi Huang, the first emperor of China. This state of affairs lasted until 206 BC, when the dynasty collapsed in the years following Qin Shi Huang's death.[4]
Qin was a minor power for the early centuries of its existence. The strength of the Qin state was greatly increased by the reforms of Shang Yang in the 4th century BC, during the Warring States period. In the mid- and late 3rd century BC, the Qin state carried out a series of swift conquests, destroying the powerless Zhou dynasty and eventually conquering the other six of the Seven Warring States. Qin's 15-year existence was the shortest major dynasty in Chinese history, with only two emperors. However, the legacy of Qin strategies in military and administrative affairs shaped the consummate Han dynasty that followed, ultimately becoming seen as the originator of an imperial system that ultimately lasted in various forms until the Xinhai Revolution in 1911.
The Qin sought to create a state unified by structured centralised political power and a large military supported by a stable economy.[5] The central government moved to undercut aristocrats and landowners to gain direct administrative control over the peasantry, who comprised the overwhelming majority of the population and labour force. This allowed ambitious projects involving three hundred thousand peasants and convicts: projects such as connecting walls along the northern border, eventually developing into the Great Wall of China, and a massive new national road system, as well as the city-sized Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor guarded by the life-sized Terracotta Army.
The Qin introduced a range of reforms such as standardised currency, weights, measures and a uniform system of writing, which aimed to unify the state and promote commerce. Additionally, its military used the most recent weaponry, transportation and tactics, though the government was heavy-handed and bureaucratic. Qin created a system of administering people and land that greatly increased the power of the government to transform environment, and it has been argued that the subsequent impact of this system on East Asia's environments makes the rise of Qin an important event in China's environmental history.
When Qin Shi Huang died in 210 BC, two of his advisors placed an heir on the throne in an attempt to influence and control the administration of the dynasty. These advisors squabbled among themselves, resulting in both of their deaths and that of the second Qin emperor. Popular revolt broke out and the weakened empire soon fell to Chu general Xiang Yu, who was proclaimed Hegemon-King of Western Chu, and Liu Bang, who founded the Han dynasty. Han Confucians portrayed the Qin as a monolithic, legalist tyranny, notably citing a purge known as the burning of books and burying of scholars; however, the earliest account of this event is in Sima Qian's Shiji (c. 91 BC), and some modern scholars dispute its veracity.[6]
Origin and development, 9th century – 230 BC
[edit]According to the Shiji (c. 91 BC), during the 9th century BC, Feizi, a supposed descendant of the ancient political advisor Gao Yao, was granted rule over the settlement of Qin (秦邑) (present-day Qingshui County in Shaanxi). During the rule of King Xiao of Zhou, the eighth king of the Zhou dynasty, this area became known as the state of Qin. In 897 BC, under the Gonghe Regency, the area became a dependency allotted for the purpose of raising and breeding horses.[7] One of Feizi's descendants, Duke Zhuang, became favoured by King Ping of Zhou, the 13th king in that line. As a reward, Zhuang's son, Duke Xiang, was sent eastward as the leader of a war expedition, during which he formally established the Qin.[8]
The state of Qin first began a military expedition into central China in 672 BC, though it did not engage in any serious incursions due to the threat from neighbouring tribesmen. By the dawn of the 4th century BC, the neighbouring tribes had all been either subdued or conquered, and the stage was set for Qin expansionism.[9]
Warring States period, c. 475 – 230 BC
[edit]During the Warring States period (c. 475 – 221 BC), the Qin statesman Shang Yang introduced a series of advantageous military reforms between 361 BC and his death in 338 BC. Yang also helped to construct the Qin capital at Xianyang, a city that ultimately resembled the capitals of the other states.[10]
Qin engaged in practical and ruthless warfare. From the preceding Spring and Autumn period (c. 770 – c. 481 BC), the prevailing philosophy had dictated war as a gentleman's activity; military commanders were instructed to respect what they perceived to be Heaven's laws in battle. For example, during a war Duke Xiang of Song was waging against Chu, he declined an opportunity to Chu forces that were crossing a river. After allowing them to cross and marshal their forces, he was decisively defeated in the ensuing battle. When he admonished by his advisors for excessive courtesy to the enemy, he retorted, "The sage does not crush the feeble, nor give the order for attack until the enemy have formed their ranks."[11] The Qin disregarded this military tradition, taking advantage of their enemy's weaknesses. A nobleman in the state of Wei accused Qin of being "avaricious, perverse, eager for profit, and without sincerity. It knows nothing about etiquette, proper relationships, and virtuous conduct, and if there be an opportunity for material gain, it will disregard its relatives as if they were animals."[12] This, combined with a strong leadership from long-lived rulers, openness to employ talented men from other states, and little internal opposition gave the Qin a strong political base.[13]
The Qin had a large, efficient army and capable generals. They used the newest developments in weaponry and transportation, which many of their enemies lacked. These latter developments allowed greater mobility over several different terrain types which were most common in many regions of China. Thus, in both ideology and practice, the Qin were militarily superior.[14] Qin also possessed geographical advantages, with the fertility and strategic position of its territory protected by mountains making the state a natural stronghold. This was the heart of the Guanzhong region, as opposed to the Yangtze drainage basin. The warlike nature of the Qin in Guanzhong inspired a Han dynasty adage: "Guanzhong produces generals, while Guandong produces ministers."[7] Its expanded agricultural output helped sustain Qin's large army with food and natural resources;[13] the Wei River canal built in 246 BC was particularly significant in this respect.[15]
Unification and expansion, 230–210 BC
[edit]During the Warring States period preceding the Qin dynasty, the major states vying for dominance were Yan, Zhao, Qi, Chu, Han, Wei and Qin. The rulers of these states styled themselves as kings, rather than using the titles of lower nobility they had previously held. However, none elevated himself to believe that he had the Mandate of Heaven, as the Zhou kings had claimed, nor that he had the right to offer sacrifices; they left this to the Zhou rulers.[16]
Before their conquest in the 4th and 3rd centuries BC, the Qin suffered several setbacks. Shang Yang was executed in 338 BC by King Huiwen due to a personal grudge harboured from his youth. There was also internal strife over the Qin succession in 307 BC, which decentralised Qin authority somewhat. Qin was defeated by an alliance of the other states in 295 BC, and shortly after suffered another defeat by the state of Zhao, because the majority of their army was then defending against Qi. The aggressive statesman Fan Sui (范雎), however, soon came to power as prime minister even as the problem of the succession was resolved, and he began an expansionist policy that had originated in Jin and Qi, which prompted the Qin to attempt to conquer the other states.[17]
The Qin were swift in their assault on the other states. They first attacked the Han, directly east, and took thir capital city of Xinzheng in 230 BC. They then struck northward; the state of Zhao surrendered in 228 BC, and the northernmost state of Yan followed, falling in 226. Next, Qin armies launched assaults to the east, and later the south as well; they took the Wei city of Daliang (now called Kaifeng) in 225 and forced Chu to surrender by 223. Lastly, they deposed the Zhou dynasty's remnants in Luoyang and conquered Qi, taking the city of Linzi in 221 BC.[18]
Upon the completion of Qin's conquests in 221 BC, King Zheng – who had first assumed the throne of the Qin state at age 9[19] – became the effective ruler of China.[20] The subjugation of the six states was done by King Zheng who had used efficient persuasion and exemplary strategy. He solidified his position as sole ruler with the abdication of his prime minister, Lü Buwei. The states made by the emperor were assigned to officials dedicated to the task rather than place the burden on people from the royal family.[20] He then combined the titles of the earlier Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors into the new name "Shi Huangdi", meaning 'First Emperor'. The newly declared emperor ordered all weapons not in the possession of the Qin to be confiscated and melted down. The resulting metal was sufficient to build twelve large ornamental statues at the Qin's newly declared capital at Xianyang.[21]
Southward expansion, 214–206 BC
[edit]In 214 BC, Qin Shi Huang secured his boundaries to the north with a fraction of his large army (roughly 100,000 men) and sent the majority (500,000 men) of his army south to conquer the territory of the southern tribes. Prior to the events leading to Qin dominance over China, they had gained possession of much of Sichuan to the southwest. The Qin army was unfamiliar with the jungle terrain, and it was defeated by the southern tribes' guerrilla warfare tactics with over 100,000 men lost. However, in the defeat Qin was successful in building a canal to the south, which they used heavily for supplying and reinforcing their troops during their second attack to the south. Building on these gains, the Qin armies conquered the coastal lands surrounding Guangzhou, and took the provinces of Fuzhou and Guilin. They may have struck as far south as Hanoi. After these victories in the south, Qin Shi Huang moved over 100,000 prisoners and exiles to colonise the newly conquered area. In terms of extending the boundaries of his empire, the First Emperor was extremely successful in the south.[21]
Campaign against the Xiongnu, 215 BC
[edit]However, while the empire at times was extended to the north, the Qin could rarely hold on to the land for long. The tribes of these locations, collectively called the Hu by the Qin, were free from Chinese rule during the majority of the dynasty.[22] Prohibited from trading with Qin peasants, the Xiongnu tribe living in the Ordos region in northwestern China often raided them instead, prompting the Qin to retaliate. After a military campaign led by General Meng Tian, the region was conquered in 215 BC and agriculture was established; the peasants, however, were discontented and later revolted. The succeeding Han dynasty also expanded into the Ordos due to overpopulation, but depleted their resources in the process. Indeed, this was true of the dynasty's borders in multiple directions; modern Xinjiang, Tibet, Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, and regions to the southeast were foreign to the Qin, and even areas over which they had military control were culturally distinct.[23]
Collapse and aftermath, 210–202 BC
[edit]Three assassination attempts were made on Qin Shi Huang,[24] leading him to become paranoid and obsessed with immortality. While on a trip to the eastern frontiers in 210 BC, Qin Shi Huang died in an attempt to procure an elixir of immortality from Taoist magicians, who claimed the elixir was stuck on an island guarded by a sea monster. The chief eunuch, Zhao Gao, and the prime minister, Li Si, hid the news of his death upon their return until they were able to alter his will to place on the throne the dead emperor's most pliable son, Huhai, who took the name of Qin Er Shi.[19] They believed that they would be able to manipulate him to their own ends, and thus effectively control the empire. Qin Er Shi was, indeed, inept and pliable. He executed many ministers and imperial princes, continued massive building projects (one of his most extravagant projects was lacquering the city walls), enlarged the army, increased taxes, and arrested messengers who brought him bad news. As a result, men from all over China revolted, attacking officials, raising armies, and declaring themselves kings of seized territories.[25]
During this time, Li Si and Zhao Gao fell out, and Li Si was executed. Zhao Gao decided to force Qin Er Shi to commit suicide due to Qin Er Shi's incompetence. Upon this, Ziying, a nephew of Qin Er Shi, ascended the throne, and immediately executed Zhao Gao.[25] Increasing unrest spread amongst the people, largely caused by regional differences which survived despite Qin's attempt to impose uniformity, and many local officials had declared themselves kings. Given this climate, Ziying attempted to cling to his throne by declaring himself one king among all the others.[15] He was undermined by his ineptitude, and popular revolt broke out in 209 BC. When Chu rebels under the lieutenant Liu Bang attacked, a state in such turmoil could not hold for long. Ziying was defeated near the Wei River in 207, and surrendered shortly after; he was executed by the Chu leader Xiang Yu. The Qin capital was destroyed the next year, and this is considered by historians to be the end of the Qin Empire.[26][note 1] Liu Bang then betrayed and defeated Xiang Yu, and on 28 February 202 BC declared himself Emperor Gaozu ("High Progenitor") of the new Han dynasty.[27] Despite the short duration of the Qin, it was very influential on the structure of future dynasties.
Culture and society
[edit]Domestic life
[edit]The Qin aristocracy were largely similar to the Zhou in culture and daily life, with regional variation generally considered a symbol of the lower classes – and ultimately as contrary to the unification that the government strove to achieve.[28]
Commoners and rural villagers, who made up over 90% of the population,[29] very rarely left the villages or farmsteads where they were born. Forms of employment differed by region, though farming was almost universally common. Professions were hereditary; a father's employment was passed to his eldest son after he died.[30] The Lüshi Chunqiu[note 2] gave examples of how, when commoners are obsessed with material wealth, instead of the idealism of a man who "makes things serve him", they were "reduced to the service of things".[31]
Peasants were rarely figured in literature during the Qin dynasty and afterwards; scholars and others of more elite status preferred the excitement of cities and the lure of politics. One notable exception to this was Shennong, the so-called "Divine Father", who taught that households should grow their own food. "If in one's prime he does not plow, someone in the world will grow hungry. If in one's prime she does not weave, someone in the world will be cold." The Qin encouraged this; a ritual was performed once every few years that consisted of important government officials taking turns with the plough on a special field, to create a simulation of government interest and activity within agriculture.[30]
Architecture
[edit]Warring States-era architecture had several definitive aspects. City walls, used for defence, were made longer, and indeed several secondary walls were also sometimes built to separate the different districts. Versatility in federal structures was emphasised, to create a sense of authority and absolute power. Architectural elements such as high towers, pillar gates, terraces, and high buildings amply conveyed this.[32]
Religion
[edit]The dominant religious belief in China during the reign of the Qin, and, in fact, during much of early imperial China, was focused on the shen (roughly translating to 'spirits' or 'gods'), yin ('shadows'), and the realm they were said to live in. The Chinese offered animal sacrifices in an attempt to contact this other world, which they believed to be parallel to the earthly one. The dead were said to have simply moved from one world to the other. The rituals mentioned, as well as others, served two purposes: to ensure that the dead journeyed and stayed in the other realm, and to receive blessings from the spirit realm.[33]
Religious practices were usually held in local shrines and sacred areas, which contained sacrificial altars. During a sacrifice or other ritual, the senses of all participants and witnesses would be dulled and blurred with smoke, incense, and music. The lead sacrificer would fast and meditate before a sacrifice to further blur his senses and increase the likelihood of perceiving otherworldly phenomena. Other participants were similarly prepared, though not as rigorously.
Such blurring of the senses was also a factor in the practice of spirit intermediaries, or mediumship. Practitioners of the art would fall into trances or dance to perform supernatural tasks. These people would often rise to power as a result of their art – Luan Da, a Han dynasty medium, was granted rule over 2,000 households. Han historian Sima Qian was scornful of such practices, dismissing them as foolish trickery.[34]
Divinations to predict or influence the future were another form of religious practice during the Qin, including the ancient practice of cracking bones or turtle shells to gain knowledge of the future. The forms of divination which sprang up during early imperial China were diverse, though observing natural phenomena was a common method. Comets, eclipses, and droughts were considered omens of things to come.[35]
Etymology of China
[edit]The name Qin is believed to be the origin of the modern name for the country in many European languages, China. The word probably made its way into the Indo-Aryan languages first as Cina or Sina, and then into Greek and Latin as Sinai or Thinai. It was then borrowed into English and French as China and Chine. This etymology is dismissed by some scholars, who suggest that Sina in Sanskrit evolved much earlier before the Qin. However, the preceding state of Qin was itself founded in the 9th century BC. Jin, a state during the Zhou dynasty until the 4th century BC, is another possible origin.[37] Others have argued for the names of other polities during the early period as the ultimate origin, including Jing (荆), another name for Chu.[38]
Government and military
[edit]The Qin government was highly bureaucratic, and was administered by a hierarchy of officials, all serving the First Emperor. The Qin put into practice the teachings of Han Fei, allowing the First Emperor to control all of his territories, including those recently conquered. All aspects of life were standardised, from measurements and language to more practical details, such as the length of chariot axles.[39][better source needed]
The states made by the emperor were assigned to officials dedicated to the task rather than placing the burden on people from the royal family. Zheng and his advisors also introduced new laws and practices that ended aristocratic rule in China, fully replacing it with a centralised, bureaucratic government. A supervisory system, the Censorate was introduced to monitor and check the powers of administrators and officials at each level of government.[40] The Qin instituted a permanent system of ranks and rewards, consisting of twenty ranks based on the number of enemies killed in battle or commanding victorious units. Ranks were not hereditary unless a soldier died heroically in battle, whereby the soldier's rank will be inherited by his family. Each rank was assigned a specified number of dwellings, slaves and land, and ranks could be used to remit judicial punishments.[41]
The form of government created by the first emperor and his advisors was used by later dynasties to structure their own government.[20] Under this system, both the military and government thrived, as talented individuals could be more easily identified in the transformed society. Later Chinese dynasties emulated the Qin government for its efficiency, despite its being condemned by Confucian philosophy.[39][better source needed][42] There were instances of abuse, however, with one example having been recorded in the "Records of Officialdom". A commander named Hu ordered his men to attack peasants in an attempt to increase the number of "bandits" he had killed; his superiors, likely eager to inflate their records as well, allowed this.[43]
Qin Shi Huang also improved the strong military, despite the fact that it had already undergone extensive reforms.[24] The military used the most advanced weaponry of the time. It was first used mostly in bronze form, but by the 5th century BC, kingdoms such as Chu and Qin were using iron and/or steel swords. The demand for this metal resulted in improved bellows. The crossbow had been introduced in the 5th century BC and was more powerful and accurate than the composite bows used earlier. It could also be rendered ineffective by removing two pins, which prevented enemies from capturing a working crossbow.[44]
The Qin also used improved methods of transportation and tactics. The state of Zhao had first replaced chariots with cavalry in 307 BC, but the change was swiftly adopted by the other states because cavalry had greater mobility over the terrain of China.[45]
Qin Shi Huang developed plans to fortify his northern border, to protect against nomadic invasions. The result was the initial construction of what later became the Great Wall of China, which was built by joining and strengthening the walls made by the feudal lords, which would be expanded and rebuilt multiple times by later dynasties, also in response to threats from the north. Another project built during his rule was the Terracotta Army, intended to protect the emperor after his death.[24] The Terracotta Army was inconspicuous due to its underground location, and was not discovered until 1974.[46]
Writing reform
[edit]The written language of the Qin was logographic, as that of the Zhou had been. It was more conservative of earlier graphic forms than more evolved local scripts in other regions.[47] As one of his most influential achievements in life, prime minister Li Si standardised the writing system to be of uniform size and shape across the whole country. This would have a unifying effect on the Chinese culture for thousands of years. He is also credited with creating the small seal script style, which serves as a basis for modern Chinese and is still used in cards, posters, and advertising.[48]
Penal policy
[edit]Qin law was primarily administrative, with penal law included alongside ritual orthopraxy. While Shang Yang, and maybe Han Fei, were influential for Qin administration, the Qin abandoned Shang Yang's harsh penal policy before 221.[49] Comparative model manuals guided penal legal procedures based on real-life situations, with publicly named wrongs linked to punishments. While some Qin penal laws deal with infanticide or other unsanctioned harm of children, it primarily concerned theft; it does not much deal with murder. By contrast, detailed rules and "endless paperwork" tightly regulate grain, weights, measures, and official documents.[50][51]
Like most ancient societies, the Qin did not create separate structures of administration and jurisprudence,[52] but did recognise concepts like intent, judicial procedure, defendant rights, retrial requests, and a distinction between different kinds of law (common law and statutory law). The Qin frequently expelled criminals to colonies, or pardoned them in exchange for fines, labour, or a demotion in aristocratic rank, even for capital offences. While Qin penal law is generally characterised as harsh by modern standards, the punishments as laid out in the legal code often went unenforced.[53] While the Han-era writer Dong Zhongshu (179–104 BC) noted the severity of Qin officials and taxes, he did not characterise punishments as such; in fact, Dong criticised the Qin system for its inability to punish criminals.[54][55] Criminals were sometimes given amnesties during the Qin, and only incurred punishment upon recidivism.[56]
Sovereigns
[edit]Qin Shi Huang was the first Chinese sovereign to proclaim himself "Emperor", after unifying China in 221 BC. That year is therefore generally taken by historians to be the start of the "Qin dynasty" which lasted for 14 years until 207, when it was cut short by civil wars.[57]
No. | Posthumous name | Personal name | Reign |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shi Huangdi | Zheng (政) | 221–210 BC |
2 | Er Shi Huangdi | Huhai (胡亥) | 210–207 BC |
3 | — | Ziying (子嬰) | 207 BC |
Imperial family tree
[edit]Qin dynasty | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Notes
[edit]- ^ The first emperor of the Qin had boasted that the dynasty would last 10,000 generations; it lasted only about 15 years. Morton 1995, p. 49
- ^ A text named for its sponsor Lü Buwei; the prime minister of the Qin directly preceding the conquest of the other states.
References
[edit]Citations
[edit]- ^ Taagepera 1979, p. 121.
- ^ "Qin dynasty". Encyclopædia Britannica. 3 September 2019.
- ^ "Qin". Collins English Dictionary (13th ed.). HarperCollins. 2018. ISBN 978-0-00-828437-4.
- ^ Li 2013, p. 6.
- ^ Tanner 2010, pp. 85–89.
- ^ Lander 2021.
- ^ a b Lewis 2007, p. 17.
- ^ "Chinese surname history: Qin". People's Daily. Archived from the original on 10 May 2008. Retrieved 28 June 2008.
- ^ Lewis 2007, pp. 17–18.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 88.
- ^ Morton 1995, pp. 26, 45.
- ^
- Bodde, Derk (1967) [1938]. China's First Unifier: A Study of the Chʻin Dynasty as Seen in the Life of Li Ssŭ 李斯 280?–208 B.C.. Sinica Leidensia. Vol. 3. Brill. p. 3 – via the Internet Archive.
- Translated from Sima Qian; Sima Tan (1739) [90s BC]. "44: Hereditary House of Wei". Shiji 史記 [Records of the Grand Historian] (in Literary Chinese) (punctuated ed.). Beijing: Imperial Household Department.
- ^ a b Kinney & Hardy 2005, p. 10.
- ^ Morton 1995, p. 45.
- ^ a b Lewis 2007, pp. 18–19.
- ^ Morton 1995, p. 25.
- ^ Lewis 2007, pp. 38–39.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 10.
- ^ a b Bo 2008, pp. 134–135.
- ^ a b c Loewe 2007
- ^ a b Morton 1995, p. 47.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 129.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 5.
- ^ a b c Borthwick 2006, p. 10.
- ^ a b Kinney & Hardy 2005, pp. 13–15.
- ^ Bodde 1986, p. 84.
- ^ Morton 1995, pp. 49–50.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 11.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 102.
- ^ a b Lewis 2007, p. 15.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 16.
- ^ Lewis 2007, pp. 75–78.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 186.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 180.
- ^ Lewis 2007, p. 181.
- ^
- Coatsworth, John; Cole, Juan; Hanagan, Michael P.; Perdue, Peter C.; Tilly, Charles; Tilly, Louise (2015). Global Connections: Volume 1, To 1500: Politics, Exchange, and Social Life in World History. Cambridge University Press. p. 138. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139047913. ISBN 978-1-316-29777-3 – via Google Books.
- O'Brien, Patrick Karl; et al., eds. (2007) [2002]. Atlas of World History. Oxford University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-19-521921-0 – via Google Books.
- Van Den Bosch, Jeroen; Fauve, Adrien; De Cordier, B. J., eds. (2021). The European Handbook of Central Asian Studies. Ibidem. p. 403. ISBN 978-3-8382-1518-1 – via Google Books.
- ^ Keay 2009, p. 98.
- ^ Wade 2009, p. 19, "This thesis also helps explain the existence of Cīna in the Indic Laws of Manu and the Mahabharata, likely dating well before Qin Shihuangdi.".
- ^ a b World and Its Peoples: Eastern and Southern Asia, p. 36
- ^ Xue & Qi 2019, p. 415.
- ^ Hui 2005, p. 81.
- ^ Borthwick 2006, pp. 9–10.
- ^ Chen & Wu 2007, pp. 180–181.
- ^ Morton 1995, p. 26.
- ^ Morton 1995, p. 27.
- ^ Morton 1995, p. 49.
- ^ Qiu 1988, pp. 97–98.
- ^ Bedini 1994, p. 83.
- ^ Pines 2023.
- ^ Bodde 1986, p. 60.
- ^ Cheng 2008, p. 208.
- ^ Hulsewé 1986, p. 528.
- ^ Hulsewé 1986, pp. 526, 534–535; Goldin 2005, p. 5.
- ^ Loewe 2011, pp. 93–94.
- ^ Goldin 2005, pp. 5–6.
- ^ Pines 2014, p. 213.
- ^ Bodde 1986, p. 20.
Works cited
[edit]- Barbieri-Low, Anthony J.; Yates, Robin D. S. (2015). Law, State, and Society in Early Imperial China. Sinica Leidensia. Vol. 126. Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004300538. ISBN 978-90-04-30053-8.
- Bedini, Silvio (1994). The Trail of Time: Shih-chien Ti Tsu-chi: Time Measurement with Incense in East Asia. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-37482-8 – via Google Books.
- Bo Yang (柏杨) (2008). 中国帝王皇后亲王公主世系录 [Records of the Genealogy of Chinese Emperors, Empresses, and Their Descendants] (in Chinese). Vol. 1. Taiyuan: Zhongguo youyi chubangongsi.
- Borthwick, Mark (2006). Pacific Century: The Emergence of Modern Pacific Asia. Westview. ISBN 978-0-8133-4355-6.
- Chen, Guidi; Wu, Chuntao (2007). Will the Boat Sink the Water?: The Life of China's Peasants. Translated by Zhu, Hong. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-58648-441-5 – via Google Books.
- Cheng, Chung-ying (2008). "The Yi-jing and Yin-Yang way of thinking". In Mou, Bo (ed.). The Routledge History of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-24937-4.
- Goldin, Paul R. (2005). After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. University of Hawaiʻi Press. doi:10.26530/oapen_625891. ISBN 978-0-8248-2842-4.
- Hui, Victoria Tin-bor (2005). War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614545.002. ISBN 978-1-139-44356-2.
- Keay, John (2009). China: A History. Harper. ISBN 978-0-00-722178-3.
- Kinney, Anne Behnke; Hardy, Grant (2005). The Establishment of the Han Empire and Imperial China. Westport, CT: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-32588-5.
- Lander, Brian (2021). The King's Harvest: A Political Ecology of China from the First Farmers to the First Empire. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-25508-9.
- Lewis, Mark Edward (2007). The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. London: Belknap. ISBN 978-0-674-02477-9 – via the Internet Archive.
- Li, Feng (2013). Early China: A Social and Cultural History. New Approaches to Asian History. Vol. 12. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139034395. ISBN 978-0-521-89552-1.
- Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L., eds. (1999). The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 BC. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47030-8.
- Loewe, Michael. "The Heritage Left to the Empires". In Loewe & Shaughnessy (1999), pp. 967–1032. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521470308.016
- ——— (9 September 2007). "China's First Empire". History Today. Vol. 57, no. 9. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 17 April 2017.
- ——— (2011). Dong Zhongshu, a ‘Confucian’ Heritage and the Chunqiu fanlu. China Studies. Vol. 20. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004194656.i-370.15. ISBN 978-90-04-21486-6.
- Morton, W. Scott (1995). China: Its History and Culture (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-043424-0.
- Pines, Yuri (2009). Envisioning Eternal Empire. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-3275-9.
- ———; Shelach-Lavi, Gideon; Falkenhausen, Lothar von; Yates, Robin D. S. (2014). Birth of an Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-28974-1.
- ——— (2017). "Confucius' Elitism: The Concepts of junzi and xiaoren Revisited". In Goldin, Paul R. (ed.). A Concise Companion to Confucius. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Vol. 65. Wiley. pp. 164–184. doi:10.1002/9781118783863.ch8. ISBN 978-1-118-78387-0.
- ———. "Legalism in Chinese Philosophy". In Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 ed.).
- Qiu, Xigui (2000) [1988]. Chinese Writing. Early China Special Monograph Series. Vol. 4. Translated by Mattos, Gilbert L.; Norman, Jerry. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China, University of California. ISBN 978-1-55729-071-7.
- Smith, Kidder (2003). "Sima Tan and the Invention of Daoism, 'Legalism,' et cetera". Journal of Asian Studies. 62 (1). Duke University Press: 141–144. JSTOR 3096138.
- Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 121. JSTOR 1170959.
- Tanner, Harold (2010). China: A History. Hackett. ISBN 978-1-60384-203-7.
- Twitchett, Dennis; Loewe, Michael, eds. (1986). The Cambridge History of China, Volume 1: The Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 BC–AD 220. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521243278. ISBN 978-0-521-24327-8.
- Bodde, Derk. "The State and Empire of Chʻin". In Cambridge History of China (1986), pp. 20–102.
- Hulsewé, A. F. P. "Chʻin and Han Law". In Cambridge History of China (1986), pp. 520–544.
- Wade, Geoff (May 2009). "The Polity of Yelang (夜郎) and the Origin of the Name 'China'" (PDF). Sino-Platonic Papers. 188. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 September 2011. Retrieved 4 October 2011.
- Xue, Deshu; Qi, Xiuqian (2019). "Research on Supervision System in Ancient China and Its Contemporary Reference" (PDF). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 319.
Further reading
[edit]- Breslin, Thomas A. (2001). Beyond Pain: The Role of Pleasure and Culture in the Making of Foreign Affairs. Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-275-97430-5 – via Google Books.
- Ivanhoe, Philip J.; Van Norden, Bryan W., eds. (2005). Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Hackett. ISBN 978-0-87220-780-6 – via Google Books.
- Korolkov, Maxim (2022). The Imperial Network in Ancient China: The Foundation of Sinitic Empire in Southern East Asia. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-367-65428-3.
External links
[edit]- Media related to Qin Dynasty at Wikimedia Commons
- Qin dynasty
- Dynasties of China
- Iron Age Asia
- Former countries in East Asia
- States and territories established in the 3rd century BC
- 221 BC
- 220s BC establishments
- States and territories disestablished in the 3rd century BC
- 1st-millennium BC disestablishments in China
- Qin Shi Huang
- Former monarchies of East Asia
- Former empires