User talk:Krycha

Hello Krycha and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Hi, and welcome! But you might like to go back to VfD and sign your post there, otherwise it may be ignored. It's a lot easier for you to verify the authorship of the comment than for others to go to the history of a page that's as frequently updated as VfD, although someone will eventually. Any questions feel free to drop me a line. Andrewa 06:28, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Under a Killing Moon FrontBox.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Under a Killing Moon FrontBox.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 19:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gawith Apricot article had to be cleaned up

Gawith Apricot article had to be cleaned up, read like an AD. By the way I use to be able to buy the stuff in Canada for $8 (that a whole 6-7 euros!), we got high taxes! Plus I used about 2 cans a week up my nose. So much for one euro lasting a month :-(

And starting in next month tobacco snuff, at least the nasal kind will be outlawed in Canada, because the government wants to TAX smokeless products even more and the German companies think that 400% is just to outrages to continue offering their product to Canadians >;( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.202.1.177 (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cybermag screen003.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cybermag screen003.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gletscher Prise

The article Gletscher Prise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NPRODUCT due to lack of secondary sourcing such as major reviews, critical reception or evidence of impact on its field.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]